titotal@awful.systems to

SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years ago

Sequence classic: "I don’t think you could get up to 99.99% confidence for assertions like “53 is a prime number.”

www.lesswrong.com

22

Sequence classic: "I don’t think you could get up to 99.99% confidence for assertions like “53 is a prime number.”

www.lesswrong.com

titotal@awful.systems to

SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years ago

Infinite Certainty — LessWrong

www.lesswrong.com

In “Absolute Authority,” I argued that you don’t need infinite certainty: …

Chat

kuna@awful.systems
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
8·
2 years ago
What about the Grothendieck Prime?

SneerClub@awful.systems

sneerclub@awful.systems

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !sneerclub@awful.systems

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

Posts or links discussing our very good friends should have “NSFW” ticked (Nice Sneers For Winners).

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from our very good friends.

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

13 users / day
191 users / week
658 users / month
118 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
863 subscribers
267 Posts
4.65K Comments
Modlog