• Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So much work just to avoid using Redis. If I wanted to use SQL for cache, I’d rather choose the memory engine of MySQL.

    • lysdexic@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I wanted to use SQL for cache, I’d rather choose the memory engine of MySQL.

      Why would you onboard an entirely separate service if you’re already using PostgreSQL ?

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly it feels like a hack with multiple drawbacks. I’d personally rather use something specifically designed for the job.