Looks really great, thanks for sharing!
It wouldn’t. Source: I’ve got one and it sucks.
Nice! Is that the model I made, or did you recreate it yourself?
Isn’t that pretty much the consensus that vinyls have the best sound…?
I sometimes manually push new filament through the bowden to finish a print on my MINI. No retraction once it reaches the extruder, though.
Stringing.
I’ve had issues with wet PLA filament that were solved immediately by drying it.
Many, many things. But the most ambitious is… this. I haven’t yet had the courage to even start tackling it.
Ah, a little too far for me (Europe), the shipping wouldn’t be nice.
Where are you from and which printer are you selling and for how much?
Nix shell basically just downloads the software (if it’s not already downloaded) and then modifies your PATH to include the new software.
Persistent data stay persistent.
Nix shell has one use case common with docker (local development), but other than that the solutions are not similar at all.
Ah, mine didn’t make the cut. It’s https://api.pornstars-per-capita.com and it does exactly what you expect based on the domain name.
Half of that are lies and you can clearly see how up to date it is, because in one example it mentions php 5.1. That is close to 20 years old, it was released in 2005. I’m not gonna spend my time trying to disprove something that refers to a 20 years old version as its point of reference.
Don’t get me wrong, there are valid drawbacks of PHP (as with any language), this document just isn’t a good representation of that.
Well, do you? Or is this just a hypothetical?
Well, that’s quite easy - if you judge a language by what it looked like 10 years ago, your opinion doesn’t matter
So much work just to avoid using Redis. If I wanted to use SQL for cache, I’d rather choose the memory
engine of MySQL.
@DallE@lemmings.world An extraplanar nightmare creature being summoned by writing a code that is mixture of php and C++.
Aren’t they still considered the best?