And its because it was made by devs for devs. Not corporate ghouls that just want to squeeze another penny or data from you.
And its because it was made by devs for devs. Not corporate ghouls that just want to squeeze another penny or data from you.
I mean, it’s still a very nice language. I can see someone, marveled by that, would endeavor to make bigger things with it. I just don’t feel it scales that well.
That’s actually a good idea, enforcing it. Still, do these linters protect against misuse? E.g I have an int but place a string on it somewhere?
I’ve noticed that the larger the code review, the faster it needs to get done in order to avoid merge conflicts, which means large code reviews are much less effective in proportion to the size.
Exactly. And in larger corporations where you have many people contributing and the code is moving fast, having people nitpick your PRs just for show is crap because it delays everything sometimes by days. I had to say no very clearly to some people on code reviews because they were demanding me to place variables in alphabetical order on hard PRs that took quite sometime to get working and were very prone to code conflicts.
I don’t mean it doesn’t work for larger projects. Just that it’s a pain to understand other’s code when you have almost no type information, making it, to me, a no go for that
Here’s another: most code reviews on larger companies are BS, just for show and nitpicking.
Python is only good for short programs
I agree with C and Make, not with vim/neovim though
Good, tell leech corporations and specially Microsoft to fuck right off. Pay for it or do it yourselves.