lad

It errs on the passive side too much 😅

I think the point was more along the lines of “it will be hard, but you [the recipient] will have to write your subordinates to cut the crap”

Fundamentally, pride is not just a party, it is a protest.

And people often tend to say “but why do they need the parade if we let them be?” Because otherwise it’ll be a couple of years before someone will start lynchings.

I just hope the society will sometimes be free of fear for everyone

“we call it Drop street for short”

Yes, please

I thought it’s the standard’s name that fits the situation, but it appears to be humans at a blame as usual

They have a point, though. It’s digital representation that should reflect real world, not the other way around.

In the same way I can totally imagine truncating street signs with names too long for a char(16) field someone came up with when creating a DB. Reminds me of people making logistics software and limiting Zip codes to be 6 digits.

I see, thank you for an insight

this kind of bear, I hope?

I think the answer should depend a lot on the species of a bear

AI obsession

To be fair, of all the problems with that CEO, this one I fail to see

Not immediately, I guess. But it’s sad to see that good things don’t just happen themselves

Sometimes it’s possible, I think

Yes, that was totally that 🌚

!In all seriousness, they may have had that idea but I can’t make me see it that way reading that article !<

I mean, that quote you mention sounds pretty innocent, but the other ones, like

was accused of making up fake female speakers to attract high-profile speakers

fake profiles created by the event organizers to make the event look diverse in order to “successfully attract some of the most heavy-hitter men speakers in tech.”

Sound almost like it was going to be a human trafficking fair rather than a programming conference. If the idea that some great male speakers will come to the conference just because there will be female speakers is correct then it’s fcked way beyond what I would imagine. Sounds as if IT is a bunch of creeps although I know for granted that it’s not (only) like that

I even thought that this (hardness) was intended to emphasize the way it’s hard to spot problems in real codebase 😅

When something is enforced on type level it doesn’t require your memory and usually doesn’t require computation.

As of lately I came to think that being explicit is mostly better than being expressive. So in this case stating all the units might work better than having a concise progtam.

Split it maybe? After all, they’ve started before any prize was available for that, so it’ll be a nice bonus

Although I agree with you that people shouldn’t equate company values and employees’ values, I’d say that it could be true, especially if they did work there for long enough.

As for my personal opinion, this could likely be solved by a short questionnaire on why they left the company and what do they think of this and that.

I have never tried to get into FAANG (MAAMA 😅) but if I did, I’d definitely focus more on how to get there, not on why that’s a bad idea, so it’s not quite correct to judge based on the fact that someone worked somewhere.

As a side note, I had never did a thorough research of companies I applied to, somehow it mostly worked out, but I did sometimes end up in the company I wasn’t quite comfortable in ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You can redo and resubmit it, as is written on the page

I hope we’re going to have the corporation eat it and stop squeezing every last drop out of devs. But that is yet to be seen and isn’t certain, unfortunately