Oh like the GPS system?

Yeah wiki also says.

Bluetooth 2.0 already supports 3mbps or (2.1mbps real world)

The bit rate of EDR is 3 Mbit/s, although the maximum data transfer rate (allowing for inter-packet time and acknowledgements) is 2.1 Mbit/s.

BT5 expands on the Low Energy specifications to allow 2mbps burst.

Bluetooth 5 provides, for BLE, options that can double the speed (2 Mbit/s burst) at the expense of range, or provide up to four times the range at the expense of data rate.

Also 802.11n already runs at 54mbps for a 20mhz wide channel.

Just remember it’s always about the profits.

Just like how they stopped selling chargers for the sake of reducing e-waste. Even though they can save on shipping weights and charge extra for 1st party chargers.

Now is it worse for the environment to produce extra chargers and cables? Or the secondary purchases, shipping, and manufacturing? I can’t tell you the actual impact.

Oh and remember the absolute trash 1A/5V charging bricks they included for the longest time ever? They hardly even pushed out 18w bricks before they nixed the entire included charger crap.

Could add a default route via interface

Maybe a /30 going to that gateway

I run 120TB on a VM with 2 cores and 2gb of ram. Data storage is not very hardware intensive. Now serving the data to dozens of users is where you’re going to have issues.

Probably Ryzen Pro series.

Providing that they don’t lock it to the vender.

Do you have a firewall between the two devices?

Can you do a packet capture to make sure that both ends are behaving as expected?

Can you double check your IPs. I’ve had this issue before by fat fingering