

Sounds like the EU needs to get a bigger stick.
Sounds like the EU needs to get a bigger stick.
They’re gearing up for war, sadly. The majority of dangerous cyber attacks are state-sponsored right now.
But why 3D printing instead of, say, injection molding? Seems overly complicated for making such a mundane shape.
Trust me, the rich do a lot more drugs than just the prescribed ones…
It’s true, but JetBrains has been pretty reliable for a closed-source company. No doubt the enshittification will eventually set in though.
Ew, their claimed benchmarking is ridiculously biased. “We completely restructured the algorithm to be more efficient, so our language is faster than yours.” and “We ran our benchmarks on a faster computer than we ran the Python benchmarks.” Not a good look to lie through your teeth like that.
Good. Let’s start to get some real competition and innovation going on in these spaces.
In addition, even the base mesh of many game assets aren’t manifold (watertight) meaning they are more akin to papercraft than 3D printable objects.
Simply embed a big ol’ neodymium magnet just under the surface of the skin on your wrist and the watch will magically stay attached! (You’ll get used to the pinched skin.)
Yeah this article is definitely suffering from a lot of biases in its logic. First off, they are cherry-picking, but there’s also survivorship bias in there.
For an obvious counter example, look at Blender. It’s gotten amazingly good even though it’s gotten more complex over the last 10 years or so.
Haha at the chip level? What’s he smoking?