• 6 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • The guy in the video explains what he means.

    So I hope no one votes without really knowing what they are voting for.

    Anyway, I thought the commentary made an interesting point. I do not agree with all of it, as it seems a bit extreme at times.

    What I do agree with is that modern storytelling can be a bit… well, let’s call it inexperienced with life. Whether that’s intentional or not, I can’t say. Discovery is a prime example. Burnham, for example, breaks rule after rule with little or no consequence. On the contrary, everyone still seems to follow her every suggestion. And when they don’t, she goes ahead on her own and the cycle starts all over again. I was so happy to see her demoted a bit in season 4, only to see her become captain the next season.

    By that logic, the most stubborn and self-centred people get the most respect. Surely there are parallels to be drawn with today’s rich and famous. Art imitates life, yes, but Star Trek was made to show a higher standard.

    Like another poster wrote, I hold modern series to the TNG standard (until something better comes along). That crew tended to behave like mature, well-trained officers. Most of the time (why would Riker sleep with that woman in First Contact???). The conversation between Data and Worf mentioned in the video is an excellent example of professional conflict resolution. No angry storming out, no fighting, no swearing, no hard feelings. I enjoy seeing professionals at work. A team bonded by trust and friendship is what I want to be a part of. A group where I never know whether they hold the same standard as me still tomorrow? Not so much.



  • I have just placed this here without voicing my opinion. Now I am wondering why there are downvotes. Does this mean you disagree with everything said in that commentary?

    If you feel this shouldn’t have been posted here, I agree with the downvote more or less. Even so, why not say as much?

    Voicing a personal opinion is usually more valuable than the click of an arrow, especially on an opinion piece. Just saying ⬇️ “No” is saying very little.

    That is only my opinion, of course. 🙂



  • My last comment was deleted because it wasn’t constructive enough. Let me try to remedy that.

    I completely agree that the confession part was not done in a way that fulfilled it’s possible potential. It felt forced and rushed. It was such a prominent plot point that had been built up for a while. IMO it would have been better for her to talk to a friend like Uhura who knew what was going on anyways. This could have made for an intimate character development moment. Like so we had more of an “alien of the week” moment.



  • Doesn’t seem likely. By the time Picard takes over, the Federation has gone to great lengths to get first contact right. I am thinking of TNG episodes like The Big Goodbye, First Contact, Who Watches the Watchers or Darmok as examples.

    And to push this further, chronologically before SNW, Enterprise already put some effort into first contact beyond Hi. Cogenitor is just one of many examples.

    I will try to resist using the Beyond opening scenes as a reference, because they were just ridiculous.




  • It’s funny how both Pike’s and Uhura’s first word with a totally unknown species is “Hi!”

    You’re Starfleet! Come on!

    OK… they will have learned this lesson by the 24 century. 😂

    Also, why treat the aliens like idiots? Why say: “You made him easier to talk to” instead of “He is now a different species.” This seemed to just have served as a plot point to make Chapel admit her feelings openly.

    These minor quibbles aside it felt like an average TNG episode. And for me that means it is a successful episode.







  • Discovery had it’s moments.

    From a Star Trek universe perspective it hit way too many lows, though. This is just my opinion, of course. I found it hard to sit through some episodes. The actors are generally great, but there is too much cheap dialogue (listen to some of the Season 2 and 3 “Picard” dialogue in comparison!), underdeveloped characters, statements like the above that were written without even considering how they might age… well, this was discussed ad nauseam in many places, so I’ll stop the rant before it starts.

    Thank you Discovery for showing us what doesn’t work. Other shows learned from you.







  • Were they? Granted, it wasn’t always about helping Picard, but often it was. In “Q Who”, for example, Q teaches Picard humility and prepares him for something greater. In “Tapestry”, Q teaches Picard the importance of his past and how even our mistakes shape who we are. In “All Good Things…”, Q stands by Picard’s side to save humanity. To name just three.

    Not that Picard was always Q’s focus, but often he was. He was certainly a tough friend with his own unique methods. But I like to think that only now does Jean-Luc - and I - understand that Q did much of what he did out of a sense of concern for humanity, and Picard in particular.

    Either way, it is a beautiful scene that will stand the test of time for a long time to come.