In theory.
How would you handle a situation where in addition to “eat the rich”, people start to say “eat the working class supporters of the rich” or “eat the families of the working class supporters of the rich” or “eat the ‘eat the rich’ dissenters”?
If you answer “that’s never gonna happen,” I hope you’re right because I hate to say “I told you so.”
Working class neighbor who earns 0.1% more: *sweats profusely*
Artificial scarcity and charge high for the trickle of legal distributed works and content.
In theory, a way for an artist to independently sustain continuous output of creations.
That hinges on the idea that nontangible assets are not scarce (which IMO applies or might just as well apply if it’s in the internet). You are not entitled to a boxed copy of ET (1982), but the same arguments can’t be applied to electronic copies of it.
This may be hot take, but I think games are art and are part of our cultural legacy, and making steps that stops us from enjoying us from that legacy should be considered a crime, especially when they put at risk art disappearing forever.
How can I reconcile it with, say, as a private entity, I have the right to withhold sharing my ideas or creations for whatever reason?
Short answer: don’t. Ask questions that demonstrate familiarity with concepts that you and your team encounter in a regular basis.
If you insist on a coding challenge, give them an old but difficult problem your team encountered in the job and assess how they would solve it.