Yes, nicely put! I suppose ‘hallucinating’ is a description of when, to the reader, it appears to state a fact but that fact doesn’t at all represent any fact from the training data.
Yes, nicely put! I suppose ‘hallucinating’ is a description of when, to the reader, it appears to state a fact but that fact doesn’t at all represent any fact from the training data.
I think ‘hallucinating’ means when it makes up the source/idea by (effectively) word association that generates the concept, rather than here it’s repeating a real source.
Don’t hate, that’s their actual name.
If you wish to relinquish your hope of licensed comments, you may therefore make personal attacks again. But, please direct them all at me, so as not to hurt others’ feelings.
Does that go for the xz vulnerability too? Wasn’t it a Microsoft dev who discovered that?
Shout out for Lapce.
I remember reading a bit about this (from Atom) a while back and having iffy feelings… I don’t wish to slander based on vague memories but certainly at the time I hoped Lapce would catch on instead.
It’s still in development, but has a handful of aspects that I really like as the right way to go about things.
See, I love Haskell, and the reason I’d choose Rust for my one language is the feeling that in principle anything I can do in Haskell I can do in Rust, with a little extra percussive head trauma; but I can never have the control in Haskell to do the beautiful efficiency I can do with Rust if I ever actually did any programming.
Unless you teach her to suck eggs. That’s a classic.