I love that.
I love that.
I hope that’s generated, because the section you quote makes only a dim amount of sense, and then only if you take on most of collaborative work of communication as the reader
Actually the main reason I’m commenting is because I wanted to say, I love your username!
I’ve only just started in on the article, but I like the writing style. Reminds me of David Rakoff’s carefully incisive voice. I loved his essays.
This one does seem unnecessary
I found it slightly better. I also find the entire user experience appealing, so that adds some points. I use web search dozens of times a day for work, so it’s worth it for me.
I probably would go back to 100% DDG if I stop working in tech.
I use this on my phone. It’s gotten pretty great!
Kagi.
I know, I know… I just really like it.
Tbh I like it, even if the content is vile shitpoison. But I also like that super crunchy, pulpy type of writing that lacks subtlety, so my taste in prose is objectively bad.
I would dare wager that he utilizes a tome of the variety known as “thesaurus” likewise as you just have
Ignore me I feel stupider just trying to explain it idk, but I’m just straight enough that I can see what they mean even if I can’t really translate it for a normal person
You’ve got to get in their twisted headspace* to decode it. They mean the former is somewhat acceptable straight behavior, while the latter is “too gay” for stupid reasons.
*not recommended for longer periods of time
When the marketing agency jumps the shark