Typically being purposely obtuse and spreading bullshit is indeed not tolerated. Hope that clarifies things!

Removed by mod

A cursory google search (minimum effort, might be wrong) indicates the Ender 3 v2 requires 350 watts. PD only hits 240W absolute maximum. Some anecdotal data from Reddit indicates you could maybe get away with 240 with a few adaptations but that’s designing for limits, and there is zero wiggle room.

Also the supply to power a 240W PD device would be stupidly expensive since that target is definitely not in widespread use. In fact, they don’t really seem to even exist yet.

PD is not the solution here!

More on PD supply wattages / voltages: https://www.usb.org/usb-charger-pd

Anecdotal power usage data (reddit, sorry!): https://www.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/comments/jpozar/ender_3_v2_power_usage/

Yeaaah except that rust-analyzer can honest to god manage to inspect macro codegen.

And the fact that macros are made to retain “span” information…

And that macros arent a huge hack…

I hope you dont use a weather integration, you of course get your weather information directly from NOAA satelites or another non-internet source.

If you cannot write safe Rust code, it places your ability to ever write safe code in doubt.

There’s no secret, no guide. Just try and do whatever you want, fail a lot, and you’ll find that soon enough you are excelling in the field.

You realize you don’t need to list all your changes in the commit message, right? Anyone can blame or diff said changes.

The commit message is meant to be used for the high level stuff, the intent, representing / connecting progress towards a larger work item, and other important context from outside the codebase. Insert other reasons that aren’t saying literally what was changed if you feel I have missed something.

Also one should use their time better if they are spending so much time writing commit messages they feel the need to automate it. Commit messages are rarely read ever again (once merged, lets say), it is not okay to be spending a lot of time on them. That’s not an excuse to write bad commit messages, but you have to balance the time cost with expected utility.

And an addendum to the above. Describing what you did without reasoning, context, or other information that isnt captured within the changes itself makes your commit messages entirely useless. It makes IDE-inserted in-line blame information useless as well. Thus you are now wasting all the time you spend on commit messages, even if you spend less because it’s automated.

What’s worse is these people who shill AI and genuinely are convinced Chat GPT and stuff are going to take over the world will not feel an ounce of shame once AI dies just like the last fad.

If I was wrong about AI being completely useless and how its not going to take over the world, I’d feel ashamed at my own ignorance.

Good thing I’m right.

Yes, but theres not much of a market for it right now sadly :(

Does it have to?