Why not add a new() function that does the same? Macro seems unneccessary

Understandable, have a nice day

Which is fewer platforms than LLVM would provide

But why

It’s probably to encourage people to underdtsnd the example properly then write their own code. Too many people copy/paste examples without understanding them completely.

Uhm. Yes they are.

Makes sense! I must admit I have zero experience in that area.

Sounds to me like people are using the term “iterate quickly” to really mean “we don’t understand the problem space and we have little usable requirements”

I agree, for “exploratory programming” Rust takes more time. To hack out quick prototypes I’d use Python.

That must be why man is written in a scripting language instead of C.

Nice. Now reimplement it in Rust

What would you suggest?

TIL about OSC52, this is very good to know, thank you for sharing!

You might want to check out embassy

What do you mean by that?

Rust programs are usually faster than equivalent Go programs, but it’s already possible to very carefully tune a Go program to achieve similar levels of speed

It is much, much more difficult to make Go run as fast as Rust compared to writing that faster in the first place Rust program.

There is no need to use C now that we have Rust

This happened to Scala with cats vs zio. I’m sad it wasn’t more successful, it’s a really, really good language

Please consider not adding licences.

I bought it, really good book. Mara did an exceptional job condensing this highly complex topic.

Finally, the victory of the ML family is at hand! Just like RISC over CISC. It just took a long time.