before tomorrow morning?

DoD contractor: Sure can, but it will cost you huge.

(Lies about the former, 100% accurate on the latter.)

a single strawman: these tools do not exist and no developer in the world cares about the topic

I haven’t seen anyone make the argument that denies these things exist - it’s that the existence of these tools are even necessary to safeguard the language in the first place is the argument. And then on top of that, you’ll additionally need a shop that is even allowed the time to properly utilize these tools and implement their usage as standard practice within the company culture.

That there are alternatives which remove (significantly more) footguns is the overall point. Work in one of these other languages so e.g. dumb-ass PMs don’t even have the option of pilfering the time it takes to code safely, as it would already be baked in.

Biden administration seems oblivious of the strengths of contemporary C++

Well ok, but the concern is about the weaknesses, Mr. Stroustrup.

Weird, clicking your link github shows me:

(Sorry about that, but we can’t show files that are this big right now.)

I can click the “raw” link, which shows the whole 32k line file, but then I don’t know which line you were trying to reference.

Can you give us the specific line number(s) you were interested in?

Annnd it’s back. Yeah after the 404 I went to the user /checkcheczz page which pulled up, and was like hey something fucky is amiss.

404 for me.

Snapshot from July.