Informatik Student, lerne 日本語, Strategiespiele
Not very stable at all, but the cli game (wordlec) is playable with the responses of whether you hit a letter or not, the naive solver and the stupid solver work too.
However, I expect that the API will change a lot before v0.1. I will release it when I deem it somewhat stable. Happy to hear you like it.
I’ve started building a wordle-analyzer. I got nerdsniped, and now I’m implementing the game (already did a game and a cli implementation using the abstracted interface) and a solver.
The idea is to provide:
I’m providing built-in versions, but anyone could implement the traits.
I currently have two solver implementations;
The naive solver can actually solve the game in less then 10 steps most of the time. Mathematically, the optimum is about 3,4 steps. There are two amazing 3blue1brown videos going into details, and my eventual goal is implementing solvers making use of that math.
I’ve been using generics and traits like never before for that project. Solver? It’s a trait. Game? It’s a trait. Word lists? It’s a trait.
And all my structs have generics <'wl, WL> so that I only need to have the word list once to save resources. You get a little crazy from the lifetime errors but it’s fun.
Besides that, my homeserver got janky this month, and today I started migrating it to proxmox. It’s hard, because I need to do a lot more thinking than just docker go brr now.
In case you want to check my wordle-analyzer out: https://git.cscherr.de/PlexSheep/wordle-analyzer I need to update the readme before publishing.
Thanks, cloned it to my homeserver
I’m working on a similar project. I can’t find the link to the source?
Is yuzu really going to “shut down”? I have it installed on my computer at least. And it’s foss, no? So anyone can clone the repo.
Damn, the repo is already gone.
deleted by creator
Thanks for your answer. As far as I can see it, the git library isn’t too much to add to my dependencies, so I’ll be using that for reasons mentioned in other comments too. I believe it will help my software to become more stable and not have to be lucky with the environment we’re in.
As of now, I don’t really care about portability itself, but I do want to write good software. What you said makes sense to me, so I’ve decided I will be using the library version, even if that means I have to read up on it’s documentation to understand the git api. Thanks!
Thank you for your answer. The git crate is still not that easy to understand, but the documentation is there and the interface is alright once you figured out what needs to be done, so I’ve decided to use it as a library.
Earlier today I thought about making a post asking about a design choice for one of my pet projects, but then i thought: Is that really relevant?
There is a lot of generally informative content here, like the talks or blog entries, so I thought it didn’t quite fit. Maybe we should start just sharing thoughts on our pet projects and design choices?
I’m building something that will help me create releases for projects on git servers, publish crates, generate change logs and so on. Up to now I was using git2 as a dependency and pushing, tagging and so on with the API, but then I thought “maybe I can just use the cli interface of git”, reducing the dependency chain of my crate and not having to worry about finding the right API calls. I’m not sure what the better choice would be. (I’m only using porcelain commands, for now)
This feels just wrong.
I’m on vacation. No working. Well, actually I was doing a ton of Selfhosting stuff (migrating my homeserver to proxmox, now at a usable level), but also video games.
The wordle-analyzer will have to wait until next week, and until I can fix my lifetime compiler errors in the latest commit, and before that: Until I fix my forgejo server that refuses to start after updating the server kernel.