I make things: electronics and software and music and stories and all sorts of other things.

  • 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • Post title is misleading as he’s not really the one causing the drama.

    The mods gave him a 6-week suspension, and now it’s up, so he requested his access back. Nothing unusual

    The drama comes from people who just hate the guy and are screaming about letting him back. His response to that was then very cordial and just calling out them for being to aggressive.

    I’m not taking a stance on whether his suspension should become a ban or whether he’s gonna change or whatever; I’m just saying it’s simply false to say he’s continuing to cause the drama and problems when all he did was ask to get his commit access back and tell his haters they’re being assholes







  • Eelco is also leftist so no

    There’s a difference between a leftist and a left-wing extremist like the handful of people involved with the open letter

    also the maintainers are what make nix be nix so yes, it’s has the potencial to affect a lot of people

    Yes of course, but the maintainers aren’t really affect either.

    What I’m saying is there are only a few maintainers upset right now, and if the tide turns (which it looks like it has) only a few maintainers on the other side will be upset.

    My point is overall only a few maintainers will be upset, like 10-20 or so out of thousands, so the status quo will stay the same.

    has very good arguments(with proofs)

    Not really

    that don’t have any correlation with left or right

    Strong correlation with far-left extremist ideas, actually

    you need to give a good argument if you want people to belive in you

    Those writing the open letter didn’t give good arguments, so I don’t need to either






  • Here’s how I think it works

    In formal language, what it means to accept a verification means does the result fall into the list of acceptable values.

    Consider adding two 2-bit numbers:

    • Alphabet: { 0, 1}
    • Language: x x consists of four binary digits representing two 2-bit binary numbers where the result of adding these two numbers is a valid 2-bit binary number (i.e. falls between 00 and 11)
    • Then you have an automata that will:
      • Start from the rightmost bit
      • Add the corresponding bits (+ carry from any previous iterations)
      • Carry over to the left if needed
      • Repeat for both bits
      • Check for acceptance
    • Machine as a whole simply checks did the inputs produce a valid 2-bit number, so it just accepts or rejects

    The machine itself simply holds this automata and language, so all it does is take input and reject/accept end state. I think you’re just getting caught up in definitions

    A sum of a list of numbers I think would be something like

    • Alphabet: digits 0-9 and ‘,’
    • Language: a single string of digits or a single string of digits followed by a comma and another valid string
    • Automata:
      • Are we a single string of digits? If yes, accept
      • Sum the last number into the first and remove the comma
      • Repeat
    • Machine: Does the some operation result in a valid string?

    Machines accept a valid state or hit an error state (accept/reject). The computation happens between the input and accept/reject.

    But maybe I don’t understand it either. It’s been a while since I poked around at this stuff.