Let’s say notifications are like walkie-talkies. You push a button, it sends an alert or your voice to the paired device. Neither one is storing the information, they are just relaying to each other. Now, in this case the government has issued a court order stating that a third party be given a walkie-talkie with the ability to understand the information transmitted by the first. There is still no storage being done, but a second party now receives all the information being broadcast.

It’s not about not having the information. You don’t actually need to store it anywhere to facilitate communication, at least beyond it being in memory which most would agree doesn’t constitute storage in this situation.

Now, could that third party store the information? Absolutely.

Capture and relay have nothing to do with storage. You can absolutely add storage, but it is in no way a necessary step.

My friend, did you read what the article you linked says? That isn’t storing the data, that’s capturing the data and relaying it, as directed by court order.

If it wasn’t for this comment, I’d have moved on never knowing what it is for. I’m not going to dig my way across the internet to figure out what something is, if it’s worth looking at someone will actually say what it is and what it does.

Just as an addition, it also lets you lock down remote usage, toggle the lights, and check for motion.

An issue a lot of people don’t think about is placement. If you’ve got the fob directly next to a device that’s broadcasting WiFi, you’re gonna have a bad time. Similarly, if it’s surrounded by thick wood or metal, you’re not going to have decent signal.

$30 could definitely fix those issues.

I have something similar, but added user names to the mix. “names_iphone” works for “alert name” and similar.

When he disassembles and adds or replaces parts to the meter

TIL a fridge magnet is “disassembling, adding or replacing parts” to a refrigerator.

The fix would be lightly grasping the 3D printed part, and giving it a slight pull. There’s no disassembly, no part replacement, and no adding parts. It’s essentially a clip on camera mount.

I agree more with the “not a monopoly” argument. While there are three main players, there are dozens of game systems out there. Whereas there are only two “real” app stores (Play Store and AppStore), and each has a (near) monopoly in a different market.

Ah, kinda annoying for lemmy users then, but if it’s useful for some then so be it.

I don’t understand the point of you. You link a post to the same post, tell everyone the new post is itself a new post… it looks like the only partially useful thing you do is add tags, and in this case it’s literally just the community name in tag form.

Why did someone write you? Why do you exist?

Isn’t onshape for non-commercial only?

You’d not really be getting that much back from a deduction. You’d need over 68% of your revenue to be taxed before it would even start to matter at lower revenue amounts.

It’s just so weird to go from “free for personal and low Commercial use”, up to “we want 68% of your revenue.”

They could easily have made it a sliding scale, or gone with profit instead of revenue.

So if you have $1001 in annual revenue, you have to pay $680? So if your business has a running cost of %50, you need to go into the red by $180 to continue running your business?

Someone over in marketing is an idiot.

A loose FEP wouldn’t cause the print to essentially perfectly skip over multiple layers. Once the FEP finally releases, there would be multiple layers missing, resulting in a very gloppy thick layer, or the remaining layers printing directly on the FEP.

I can’t think of any situation a loose FEP could result in the above image without at the very least one “extremely large” layer.

Not to mention, the FEP wouldn’t suddenly tighten, meaning you’d have the same issue over and over.

Suction cupping causes the print to rip from the build plate/supports, it wouldn’t cause this. Especially since it continues along as if a few layers were cut out of the file, which just isn’t something caused by suction cupping. It would essentially need to be stuck to the FEP to such an extreme degree that the stepper motor is unable to move.

Pauses do weird things with 3D printing, though it’s generally better with resin printers, it will still suffer. Higher end models have ways of compensating, but will still see weirdness.

It’s generally a loss of precision/placement of the bed, and (on some faulty firmware) missed layers from the read.

This looks like it could be the latter, or potentially even both.

I’d definitely try again without a pause, and if it goes properly just avoid pausing moving forward. A firmware update wouldn’t be a bad idea either, if available.

Oh, apologies I thought you meant you wired up to buttons on a myQ wall opener.

Careful with that, I’ve heard stories of the wiring picking up stray signals and opening the door without anything actually being sent.

If you’ve got a myQ door, look into ratgdo. There’s even an esphome version.