HuddaBudda

So Arya is just using chat GPT-4. Why lie about it?

Also why on earth are you asking an AI to be “impartial” while also conforming to “beliefs” it cannot rationalize? That sounds like a logical twist that only means the AI can “temporarily” hold these positions.

The understandable difference being that a gun has but one purpose: Kill people.

Whereas everything else I have mentioned, including 3d printers are multi-purpose. Not intended to kill, but to serve multiple roles.

Though, it is a good point that few devices could be cobbled together to make infinite guns so long as you had material. So I am not saying it isn’t a class of it’s own, just where does the logic end with that point?

Is it only legal for a company to print guns? How does a license alone protect people? I don’t think that is something I could answer.

A surprising enlightening read. Thank you for sharing.

I think some people would say the ability to print a gun is more deadly then a knife.

But I kind of agree with you.

If we start licensing people to own stuff that has the potential to do harm, then eventually you are going to run into a never ending list of household items and laws of natural physics:

• Bleach
• Vinegar
• Salt
• Sugar
• Chlorine
• Gas
• Natural gas
• Methane
• Fertilizers
• Electricity
• Paper
• Fire
• Propane
• Etc.