Vanilla JS is perfectly fine to do basic interactive stuff. Data Binding is a bit trickier but can be achieved neatly with Web Components. I like it.
✍️ Hobbyist Writer, 🎲 Role player, 🧩 Game master, 🚀 Sci-Fi enthusiast, 💫 Star Citizen 🇪🇺 EU Citizen, 🐧 Linux user, 🧑💻 Professional Software Developer, 🏳️⚧️ Woman
Vanilla JS is perfectly fine to do basic interactive stuff. Data Binding is a bit trickier but can be achieved neatly with Web Components. I like it.
Oh my
No Ma’am, I’ve never watched it.
Wouldn’t Nog be a better fit in this?
Given the nature of JS running only on a single thread. Promises/asynchronity is the only way to keep the browser from locking up.
Thus insisting on any other way is a major flaw in the developer not the language.
The API doesn’t restrict the amount of bytes to be hashed. So yeah it’s still heavy lifting.
Trigger a loading event after the constructor is finished that the view model takes to calculate your hash.
Sounds like an architectural issue to begin with. A constructor shouldn’t do the heavy lifting to begin with.
its a good idea to be as non blocking as possible especially on time and resource consuming tasks like IO, cryptography, …
just use await
in an async function
.
How does it compares to GraphQL?
Damn… US cops are really just the worst most of the time.
Oh damn, I had no Idea.
well, thanks for being pedantic :)
I agree, there simply isnt “unlimited” services. Also I don’t see any mention of unlimited anything on CloudFlares tiered plans, maybe I’m blind.
When you don’t play by their rules and freeload the shit out of their plan and thus violate their terms of service… yeah Termination happens, tough love.
Lol get fucked. This time the House didn’t win, because they had to play with another house’s rules. Good for CloudFlare.
What’s the worst episode of Stargate?
A lone Banjo Player likes to have their visitor to take care of their adopted children.
Every browser released since 2020 supports this (custom elements that is), so I don’t see an issue with browser support.
You mean the Html template Element? I’ve never really got that to work, but I also never seriously tried.