Absolutely.

bullshitting as in when you give a confident answer without regard of actual reality.

So you say there could be different meanings of the same word? Like “bullshitting” or “hallucination”?

LOL, okay.

LLMs bullshit all the time

Bullshitting to me is giving intentionally wrong statements. LLMs do not generate intentionally wrong statements. Saying they do, means that you imply intelligence.

LLMs know nothing nor are they intelligent. They also are not right or wrong, they generate output based on statistics.

“Hallucination” as a term for “AIs” making things up is used since the early 2000s (even if it’s meaning has changed since then).

Of course is the term stupid. Neither is an LLM an AI, nor is any AI in the current state intelligent. In the end it all boils down to being answer machines. Complex ones, but still far away from anything even remotely being am AI.

So you say, a technical term should not be created by the people who actually develop the technology the term is used for?

It’s not a “fancy word” here, but a technical term. An AI making things up is actually called hallucination.

never trust AI

Statements from LLMs are to be seen as hallucinations unless proven otherwise by classic research.

Agile software development bases on four core values (paraphrased to make them more drastic but not change them in their meaning):

• Proper tools are not important
• Documentation is irrelevant
• Don’t have a contract to adhere to
• Do not follow any plans

I am not surprised that this fails miserably.

Wood is actually quite strong. I would’t call this a temporary fix but an upgrade.

Now that he needs to be cancelled such things are popping up like crazy!

For Mastonon-compatible service have a look at GoToSocial. It’s alpha software but works very well.

Nazi nonsense aside,

when I realized how much their config mechanism (C header files and a recompile cycle) fucking sucked

That’s the thing here: It REALLY sucks. Which sucks for a project that calls itself “suckless”.

Totally worth it! Especially 2001 looks spectacularly awesome. Not only awesome for it’s age, but on par with modern productions - even surpassing them thanks to practical effects, models, and high quality filming equipment and media.

It’s a good movie, too. I remember seeing 2001 and 2010 in the years 2001 and 2010 as a double-feature in cinema.

Out of all movies, over all periods and genres? 2001: A Space Odyssey

The browser.

I can use every site I want, and I have tabs to read stuff later.

I don’t even know what the feature does. From the screenshot it implies that you can somehow browse the registry directly from within Portainer. Is this really a selling point for you?

Just open Flathub or whatever registry you like in the webbrowser and use the registries web front-end. I never found a registry that does not have a web front-end.

What does the browse feature do that can"t be done by directly opening the registry page, except maybe deploying containers from the registry directly in Portainer?

Look closer 😀

Portainer Community Edition (CE) is our open-source version

Portainer CE came first. It’s our widely adopted, open-source product, that is known and loved by home lab users across the globe. You can install Portainer CE for free.

CE provides a general-purpose management toolset that allows individuals to deploy and manage container-native applications with a high degree of ease; a lower cost of operations; and without needing to exclusively invest in any single orchestrator, Kubernetes distribution, container runtime, or cloud provider.

Additionally, as with most open-source products, support for Portainer CE is provided by the community through forums.

https://www.portainer.io/blog/portainer-community-edition-ce-vs-portainer-business-edition-be-whats-the-difference