Well the speed of light is actually faster than you can reasonably comprehend… you can’t see or experience the travel time of something going that fast. 300m is not unreasonable to understand once you’ve experienced it though - that’s a big boat, but you can see one and get a sense of the scale.
I was baffled by the shamelessly non-critical way my university stats course presented Bayesian inference. To transition smoothly from all the ways that we have to use data to produce compelling and realistic results and move on to… Numerical confidence in a belief… Seemed utterly ridiculous. Why include the belief at all? It just seems to me like you’re introducing your own biases into actual data.
Tax evasion won’t make any money for you, just keep money you already earned.