• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • I think he was using hyperbole but I understand his point of view. You watch a show, you don’t like it, you don’t watch it again. Every now and then you browse for something, see it and think “I remember I don’t like it.”

    Four years later you forget you how much you didn’t like it and go, “Meh, there’s nothing else on.”

    I was that way with Hyperdrive, the BBC comedy scifi from 2006. I watched an episode 10 years ago and didn’t get even to the end of the first episode. Tried it again a few months ago and kind of liked it. It wasn’t great, but had several good episodes.

    It wasn’t like hating Hyperdrive took up any part of my thoughts at all over the past 10 years.

    Besides, even if it was part of the OP’s thoughts, how is fandom love of a fictional television show different than fandom hate?



  • She has annoying levels of Mary Sue. “Oh, I just happen to be the Federation’s foremost heart surgeon.”

    Virus that ages people? “Oh, I happen to be the Federation’s top expert in viruses.”

    “Oh I just happen to have been involved with Riker’s dad”

    “Oh and I also performed 2 successful ocular implants so you don’t need the visor, Geordi.”

    You can get away with giving a character one expertise better than everyone else in the universe, not 3.

    It would be like if Geordi just happened the Federation’s foremost expert on warp engines instead of having to learn from Lea Brahms. And happened to be the Federation’s foremost expert on Cybernetics. And knew Riker’s sister.






  • transforms the successor in such a way that the end result is still what the author of the successor intended.

    It says that it supports multiple but how would that actually work for more than 2?

    You have 3 people who see the word two in a list and each want to add their item as 3rd in the list because it is a todo list and its place in the list is important. Appending based on previous position isn’t what they intended (contrasted with the example given where it was their intent).


  • I like the theory that it’s sent to the bridge to uplift the morale of the regular crew. They knew the officers will be the first to get blown up in any hostile encounter.

    It keeps the captain in check if he knows he’s going to get a blown up console to the face instead of a lower deck red shirt dying .

    When those protocols can’t be used like in landing parties, it’s the red shirts who die first.





  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldtoRisa@startrek.websiteRansomware
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    despite the show emphatically saying that the simulations kept repeatedly failing.

    Which I already said is odd because it means their computers aren’t any faster than today’s computers. If Disco was set in 2025, I could understand why they couldn’t simulate protein folding with enough accuracy. But this is set in the future where they can record every atom with such perfection (Heisenberg compensator) that every atom in a person’s DNA is routinely read, transported across thousands of miles and reconstructed perfectly.

    The network required a living construct to engage with. I already said there would need to be a physical interface between the computer and the mycelial network.

    You’re arguing in bad faith I had already addressed every point that you repeated. The only one ignoring what I wrote is you.

    Don’t take Trek so seriously. It’s just a show. It’s ok to point out holes.


  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldtoRisa@startrek.websiteRansomware
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    living organic link

    And you are ignoring my first post that said it’s just atoms moving and bonding. “Living” is only a chemical process. I believe it was Robert Hook who when looking at a living cell under the first microscope powerful enough, commented on his disappointment that “cells were just machinery”

    Yes their simulation failed because somehow there computers aren’t any faster than today’s computers.

    The writers knew it didn’t make any sense which is why they lampshaded it-

    Stamets: “At the quantum level, there is no difference between biology and physics. No difference at all.”


  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldtoRisa@startrek.websiteRansomware
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Proteins that could not be adequately replicated by a computer

    Yeah, but that requires a strange alternate future where computers are simultaneously both faster than today’s computers and also not any faster.

    And yes the simulation needs a compatible physical interface.