+1 for Codeberg.
Sourcehut is interesting too, but its workflow is different from GitHub.
+1 for Codeberg.
Sourcehut is interesting too, but its workflow is different from GitHub.
There are people who hang out on StackOverflow?
What do you mean? Not being open to new opportunities is only harming yourself.
It’s not like you own your Windows copy though - you are not allowed to do anything with it you want.
You have to use free - as in freedom - software, like provided by gnu.org
It’s absolutely open source, but you might rather be limited in your software freedom.
Is transpiling a form of compiling?
GNU octave 💖
I don’t get what you’re trying to say here. All terms used have a clear definition and other comments pointed that out already. The definition on open source is very clear.
So your claim is that the open source definition by the Open Source Initiative which is battle tested and widely used by distributions, major git hosts and legal enitities is a cherry-picked definition?
Sounds like you’re cherry-picking your definition to hide that you simply have no idea :)
This is plainly incorrect, please see the other responses.
FOSS stands for “free and open source software”, but they functionally mean the same thing. So what you’re saying is:
This is open source just not open source anymore
Upton Sinclair