Rationalist check-list:

  1. Incorrect use of analogy? Check.
  2. Pseudoscientific nonsense used to make your point seem more profound? Check.
  3. Tortured use of probability estimates? Check.
  4. Over-long description of a point that could just have easily been made in 1 sentence? Check.

This email by SBF is basically one big malapropism.

  • zogwarg@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unhinged is another suitable adjective.

    It’s noteworthy that how the operations plan seems to boil down to “follow you guts” and “trust the vibes”, above “Communicating Well” or even “fact-based” and “discussion-based problem solving”. It’s all very don’t think about it, let’s all be friends and serve the company like obedient drones.

    This reliance on instincts, or the esthetics of relying on instincts, is a disturbing aspect of Rats in general.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “guys check it out. we’re so rat. we’re so fucking rat we can do whole corpposts in only rat. check it out guys. guys??! where are you going? IMMA RAT THIS UNCANNY VALUE SO FUCKEN HARD OHHHH YEAH”

      - me, doing an SBF impression. digital media. 2023

    • sue_me_please@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well they are the most rational people on the planet. Bayesian thinking suggests that their own gut feelings are more likely to be correct than not, obviously.