• cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Once you go 5k (at 27”) you can never go back.

    I ised to deride them for their rediculous cost and mashup of parts, then I used one at an office I consulted at and a month later I bought myself one…

    I’m glad someone else is pushing pixel density and giving Apple competition.

    I don’t want 4k27” 300fps OLED or microLED. I just want 5k OLED now.

    • irdc@derp.foo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I concur. I have one since they’re available. Nothing compares other than my phone display really. Though the refresh rate could be a little higher (and thus the latency a little lower).

      • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Promotion and HDR are the biggest things missing, though neither really impact my work so I’m fine with it.

  • milkjug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can we just live in a world where 220ppi HRR OLED displays are a mainstream thing? Alternatively give me a cryochamber and wake me up when we do.

  • akhenaten0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s less expensive than the Apple display if you make the Apple display more expensive! Also, it comes with Smart Hub if you want to watch TV on your computer without using your computer to watch TV. Bonus feature: plasticky.

    • reallynotnick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it plastic?

      It’s got a metal build like Apple’s Studio Display

      And while I don’t think it’s a steal I can’t imagine paying $1,600 for a monitor without height adjustment so I consider it cheaper than Apple’s. It’ll probably go on sale though and be even cheaper knowing Samsung.

        • Nikls94@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, plastic is good enough, no?

          It‘s not like you’d get a benefit, besides the less-likelihood of breaking during a move

          • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I don’t really understand the plastic hate for a monitor. The only time I manually handle my monitor is when I set it up in the first place.

            Metal chassis are great on portable devices, but I don’t get the necessity for something that rarely if ever moves.

    • akhenaten0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My Studio Display is also VESA mounted. Same cost.

      Now, true, I can’t convert it back to the stand. But I’ve never actually done that with any other TV or monitor I’ve VESA mounted—I just get a pile of stands in my garage.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there’s some merit in being able to buy a monitor without a stand, but the fact that the Studio Display fittings are proprietary and non user changeable defeats the purpose.

        I’d rather monitor stand fittings be fully standardised on the VESA system, so users could easily pick and choose any stand or arm for their monitor.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s still stupid though.

        Why can’t the stand just use Vesa like every other monitor?