Will the guardian issue a correction to its EA/ manifest/ FTX article?
manifold.markets
75% chance. The Guardian piece here: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/16/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-eugenics-scientific-racism Reportedly contains many factual errors: See https://x.com/ohabryka/status/1802563541633024280?t=8IhUv03x6PKq_r5MwLbPuA&s=19 Resolves yes if one or more of these are corrected (either by stealth edit, deleting the article or editors note) by the end of July.

WE DEMAND A CORRECTION TO uh various minor nitpicks

also we swear we totally didn’t get your email

bonus from thread:

I am having a lot of fun on Manifold, but if the team insists on inviting eugenics speakers to conferences, its probably time for me to leave :-/

What exactly is your objection to people exercising their bodily autonomy to implement voluntary eugenics?

  • flere-imsaho@awful.systemsEnglish
    13·
    6 months ago

    she’s literally paid from an EA grant for the work at vox, so she can hardly compromise her journalistic ethics more.

    • deborah@awful.systemsEnglish
      13·
      6 months ago

      There really is a difference in professional ethics guidelines, though. Matt Levine used to work at Goldman, he totally always sides with financialization, and for that matter everyone at Bloomberg is paid by Mike Bloomberg, but they still have professional guidelines preventing them from most trading.

      ETA: lol. lmao, even

      A Vox spokesperson declined to comment on whether the company has an ethics policy in place around reporters betting on sports they cover.