I’m looking for a programming language that can help me build a desktop application for Windows, macOS, and Linux that’s not big but not small either. Additionally, I’d like to be able to build a website with the same language. I’ve been considering Ruby, Python, Golang and JavaScript. Python seems to be mainly used for scripting and ai, so I’m not sure if it’s the best fit. JavaScript has a lot of negative opinions surrounding it, while Ruby sounds interesting. Can anyone recommend a language that meets my requirements?

  • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve literally never heard anyone say that

    Well you didn’t listen then. Google the phrase.

    I can tell you’ve literally never even tried this…

    I do not need to try it to know that this is fundamental impossible. But I will try it because you can go some way towards proper type knowledge without explicit annotations (e.g. Pycharm can do this for Python) and it’s better than nothing (but still not as good as actual type annotations).

    It’s also much more readable than bash, python, javascript, etc. so writing a readable (and runnable everywhere)

    Bash definitely. Not sure I’d agree for Python though. That’s extremely readable.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Jump to declarations or usages has absolutely nothing to do with types so I have no clue why you think type annotations to make jump to useful.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh really? How would an IDE go-to-definition on x.bar in this code?

        def foo(x):
          return x.bar
        

        Best it can do is heuristics and guesswork.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          By using the AST? Do you really not know how languages work? I mean seriously, this is incredibly basic stuff. You don’t need to know the type to jump to the ast node location. Do you think that formatters for dynamic languages need to know the type in order to format them properly? Then why in the world would you need it to know where to jump to in a type definition!?!

          Edit: also in the case of Ruby, the entire thing runs on a VM which used to be YARV but I think might have changed recently. So there’s literally bytecode providing all the information needed to run it. I highly recommend reading a book about how the Ruby internals work since you seem to think you understand but it’s quite clear you don’t, or for some reason think “jump to” is this magical thing that requires types.