The cloud is over-engineered and overpriced (no music)
youtu.be
I tried the music and the feedback is clear enough that I think it's worth uploading a version of this with no music. I'm still learning!I'm sorry :( I reall...

For most personal projects, hosting on the cloud may be overkill, but tempting with its supposed ease of use and benefits of scale. Self-hosting is often overlooked as a solution with the benefit of simplicity and cost.

Interesting discussion and demonstration of self hosting the kinds of apps most personal projects will end being.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    492·
    8 months ago

    A VPS is also very expensive though. And shared hosting usually only allows HTML and PHP. So what’s the affordable alternative?

    • Orac@feddit.nl
      302·
      8 months ago

      Personally I self-host on a raspberry pi. It took me a few weeks to setup, but it has been running without problems for almost 2 years now at practically no cost (beyond purchase and electricity).

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      271·
      8 months ago

      Great question. Here’s where I’ve landed:

      • For a surprising number of things, my previous desktop, running Linux, confined to my local network, is perfectly fine.
      • For a number of other things, a Raspberry Pi, with a dedicated disk image (ISO), confined to my local network, is fine.
      • Surprisingly often, a not-at-all-dynamic dynamic DNS solution gets the job done. I follow the first half of the DynDNS guide, and then hard code my preferred IP, and skip the rest. It’s inconvenient when my IP changes, but that happens a lot less often than most folks imagine. Most DNS providers have provided this to me for free after I bought my domain name from through them.
      • For my public personal portfolio, GitHub pages works fine.
      • For additional silly static sites, AWS S3 and AWS CDN get the job done for about $3 per month.
      • When I need to do public facing database stuff, I get a virtual private server, not from Amazon or Microsoft, who both way overcharge for small apps.
      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        6·
        8 months ago

        I was surprised to find oracle’s offerings so economical for personal use. I set up a foundry server (TTRPG) and so far it hasn’t cost me a cent. Still not a fan of them or their CEO, but this is working for me.

    • William@lemmy.world
      142·
      8 months ago

      I use nearlyfreespeech.net. They bill for usage, and since my site gets almost no hits and doesn’t take much storage, it’s ridiculously cheap. Much cheaper than even he $2.50.mo VPS listed in another comment. I just checked, and I spend an average of $.30/mo.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      2·
      8 months ago

      expensive

      Highly disagree, but I realize expensiveness is subjective.

      What is your definition of not cloud? Does anyone else’s VM count? So linode or digitalocean for example would be acceptable, or no?

      I guess “alternative” is also subjective.

      • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        12·
        8 months ago

        I’ve been looking for a place to host web apps in whatever language (Rust, Nim, or whatever) and framework I want, where I can use my own domains and multiple apps, and have sudo access. And I don’t want to pay $70/month for it. I gave up on that hunt (it might have been unrealistic), although I’ll be researching some of the alternatives offered in these comments.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          1·
          8 months ago

          Oracle VMs have a perpetual free tier. Even AWS’s non-free tier starts around $3/mo, similar for buyvm/DigitalOcean/linode/etc. There are MANY options that are way cheaper than $70… unless I misunderstood your requirements.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          1·
          8 months ago

          My ovh vps costs me 60€/y. Granted it’s low end specs. What would you need exactly?