seth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-21 year agoC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1145arrow-down1external-linkC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comseth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-21 year agomessage-square104linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSuperb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
minus-squaremox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·1 year agoCondemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
minus-squaresnowe@programming.devMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoit does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.
Why can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
Condemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
deleted by creator
it does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.